Jim has over three decades of experience successfully defending class actions and complex litigation. He has handled actions in numerous state and federal jurisdictions across the country. The leader of numerous litigation teams, Jim has served as national counsel for multiple pharmaceutical and product manufacturers, for whom he has developed and implemented defense strategies in broad-ranging litigations involving cases in multiple jurisdictions. Jim has tried class actions, successfully argued class action appeals, and resolved purported class actions early and efficiently. He teaches and lectures on class actions and is widely recognized for his expertise in defending class actions as well as legal and trial strategy.

After interviewing general counsel and legal decision-makers, BTI Consulting Group named Jim a "2016 and 2017 Client Service All-Star," one of approximately 300 attorneys nationwide to receive the honor. BTI’s Client Service All-Stars are leaders in their field who receive this designation because corporate counsel singled them out for "outperforming all other attorneys" in client service. Jim has represented ConAgra Foods, Inc., Goya Foods, Inc., The J.M. Smucker Company, Pinnacle Foods Group LLC, Source Naturals, Inc., Unilever, Allergan, Inc., Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Corporation, Bausch & Lomb Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Lindsay Manufacturing Co., Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc., Nissan North America, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., QuikTrip Corp., Sanofi Synthelabo Inc., and Simon & Schuster Inc., among others, in class action litigation.

As first chair trial counsel, Jim successfully defended what may be the first Rule 23(c)(4) issue class action jury trial involving state consumer fraud allegations in the country, in which the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict. American Fiber and Cabling LLC, v. BP Products North America Inc., et al., Case No. 07-2053-KHV (D. Kan. Sept. 24, 2012). He served as trial counsel for Lorillard Tobacco Company in a statewide class action trial in which the jury rejected plaintiffs' medical monitoring claim, in one of the first medical monitoring cases to go to trial. Scott v. American Tobacco Co., 949 So.2d 1266 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

Jim enjoys looking for creative and cost-effective ways to resolve class action litigation. Recently, he persuaded plaintiffs’ counsel to dismiss several purported class actions alleging improper food labeling, based on an analysis of the appropriate regulations. His clients appreciate his creative and common sense approach to problem solving. Jim’s philosophy is to focus on the early resolution of matters before trial, to minimize the cost and business disruption to his clients.

Jim is a former chair of Shook's Diversity & Inclusion Committee. He is also very involved in pro bono efforts, having led a team in securing a significant civil rights victory for a class of 11,000 special needs foster and adopted children. Senior U.S. District Judge Scott O. Wright observed that the suit was among the most important cases he has addressed in his 27-year career on the bench. Utilizing an attorneys' fee award donated by the firm, Jim then established "Lawyers for Kids," a charitable foundation which has contributed over $100,000 to foster and adopted children and their parents.

Missouri Lawyers Media recognized Jim as a 2012 Legal Champion for his role in the successful defense of fuel retailers in the nationwide "Hot Fuel" litigation. Jim's litigation expertise has been recognized in The Best Lawyers in America, Missouri & Kansas Super Lawyers and The Best Lawyers in Kansas City

Representative Matters

Pepper v. Boulder Brands, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-06512 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2016) (Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed slack-fill class action complaint after defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint).

Thornton v. Pinnacle Foods Group LLC, No. 4:16–CV–00158, 2016 WL 5793193 (E. D. Mo. Sept. 30, 2016) (court granted motion to stay "Nothing Artificial" claim based upon primary jurisdiction of FDA).

Sensenig v. WellPet, No. 3:16-CV-50021 (N. D. Ill. June 17, 2016) (plaintiff voluntarily dismissed purported multistate class action after defendant filed a motion to dismiss and to strike class allegations).

George v. Blue Diamond Growers, No. 4:15-CV-962, 2016 WL 1464644 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 14, 2016) (court granted motion to dismiss or stay “All Natural” claim based upon primary jurisdiction of FDA).

DeMaria v. Nissan North America, Inc., 2016 WL 374145 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2016)(court dismissed purported nationwide class action, ruling that Court did not have jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs).

Cottrell v. Alcon Laboratories Inc., et al., 2016 WL 1163163 (D.N.J. Mar. 24, 2016) (court granted defendants' motion to dismiss purported class action based upon lack of Article III standing).

Dougherty v. Source Naturals, Inc., No. 4:15CV574, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164117 (E.D. Mo., Dec. 8, 2015) (court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss purported class action based on federal preemption as to plaintiff’s Missouri Merchandising Practices Act claim that a multivitamin contained less nutrient levels than the labeled amounts).

In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1871, 07–MD–01871, Civil Action No. 12-3683, 100 F.Supp.3d 441 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2015) (granting defendant's motion to dismiss class action complaint for failure to allege ascertainable loss under Missouri Merchandising Practices Act).

New England Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund v. GlaxoSmithKline, 2014 WL 4119410 (E.D. Pa. 2014) (court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss purported class action based on lack of Article III standing).

Thompson v. Allergan USA, Inc., 993 F.Supp.2d 1007 (E.D. Mo. 2014) (court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss purported class action based, in part, on federal preemption). 

Hussein v. Delta Airlines, Inc., Case No. 4-00333-CV-W-BP (W.D. Mo. June 19, 2014) (plaintiff dismissed purported class action with prejudice).

Bray v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., Case No. 4:14-CV-00258-NKL (W. D. Mo. June, 25, 2014) (plaintiff voluntarily dismissed purported class action).

Levy v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 12-cv-2266 (E.D.Mo. Sept. 30, 2013) (court granted defendant's motion to strike class allegations and plaintiff then dismissed case).

Levy v. Pfizer, Inc., 719 F.3d 884 (8th Cir. 2013) (court reversed district court and held that the defendant met the Class Action Fairness Act jurisdictional requirements). 

McLaughlin v. ConAgra Foods Inc., No. 1216 – CV 20904 (Cir. Ct. of Jackson County, Missouri 2013) (plaintiff voluntarily dismissed purported class action after defendant filed a motion to dismiss).

American Fiber and Cabling LLC, v. BP Products North America Inc., et al., Case No. 07-2053-KHV (D. Kan. Sept. 24, 2012) (unanimous jury verdict in favor of defendants in statewide consumer fraud class action). 

Rohrbough v. Pinnacle Foods Group, No. 4:12-CV-00757-DGK (W.D.Mo. 2012) (plaintiff voluntarily dismissed purported class action).

Bryant v. Pinnacle Foods Group, No. 2:12-CV-05817-JFW (C.D.Cal. 2012) (plaintiff voluntarily dismissed purported class action). 

Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County, 131 S.Ct. 1342 (2011) (unanimous United States Supreme Court held that the plaintiff did not have a cause of action against the defendants). 

Judy v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 042-01946-02, 2010 WL 3001745 (Mo. Cir. Ct. July 27, 2010) (class certification denied).

Arlt v. Lindsay Corp., No. C109-324 (Neb. 5th Dist. Ct. Apr. 23, 2010) (class certification denied).

County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc., et al., 257 F.R.D. 207 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (class certification denied). 

In re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices, and Product Liability Litig., 257 F.R.D. 315 (D. Mass. 2009) (class certification denied). 

In re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices, and Product Liability Litig., 244 F.R.D. 89 (D. Mass. 2007) (class certification denied). 

In re Pharmaceutical Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 230 F.R.D. 61 (D. Mass. 2005) (class certification denied). 

Cocca v. Philip Morris Inc., 2001 WL 34090200 (Ariz.Sup. Ct. July 21, 2001) (class certification denied). 

Aksamit v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., C/A No. 6:97-3636-23, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18880 (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2000) (class certification denied).

Hansen v. American Tobacco Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11277 (E.D. Ark. 1999) (certification of medical monitoring class denied).

Emig v. American Tobacco Co., 184 F.R.D. 379 (D. Kan. 1998) (class certification denied). 

Publications and Presentations

James Muehlberger & Cary Silverman, The Food Court: Trends in Food and Beverage Class Action Litigation, U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, February 2017.

Jim Muehlberger & Elizabeth Fessler, Recipe for Primary Jurisdiction Goes "Natural," Law360, Nov. 21, 2016.

James P. Muehlberger, Lori McGroder & Iain Kennedy, Oversize Drug Packaging Suits Are A 'Waste' For Plaintiffs, Law360, March 10, 2016.

"All Natural" Class Action Consumer Litigation Update, Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City, January 21, 2016.

James P. Muehlberger & Iain L. Kennedy, The Glass Half-Empty Class Action: Slack-Fill Litigation, Law360, August 3, 2015.

Food and Beverage Industry Litigation Update, Grocery Manufacturers Association Consumer Complaints Management Conference (May 15, 2015).

James P. Muehlberger & Jeff Lingwall, The Satisfaction of A Refund, Or Your Class Action Back, Law360, April 29, 2015.

Early Resolution Strategies for Class Action Litigation, 2015 Grocery Manufacturers Association Litigation Conference (February 25, 2015).

James P. Muehlberger & Jeff Lingwall, Plaintiffs Look Beyond Labels And Toward Product Testing, Law360, February 23, 2015.

Move Over Caveat Emptor, Meet Caveat Venditor, Law360, January 2, 2015. 

Panelist, Good Law, Bad Practice: Misuse and Abuse of Missouri's Merchandising Practices Act, American Tort Reform Association and Missouri Chamber Legal Foundation CLE Program (November 5, 2014).

How To Fight The Rising Tide Of Cosmetic Class Actions, Law360, June 3, 2014. 

Making an Issue Out of It: The Trial of a 23(c)(4) Class, 2013 DRI Class Actions Conference (July 26, 2013).

Scott Lauck, Hot Fuel Team: Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Legal Champions, Missouri Lawyers Weekly, Jan. 2013. 

Does 'Wal-Mart' Doom Expansive Reading of Rule Authorizing Class Actions for 'Particular Issues'?, The National Law Journal, July 11, 2012. 

Food-Related Class Action Litigation: What's Hot?, Agribusiness/Food Safety CLE Webcast (May 24, 2011).

Elaine Meyer, Plaintiffs Lose Class Cert. Bid in Mo. Neurontin Case, Law 360, July 2010.

Missouri Class Actions and the Merchandising Practices Act, Missouri Judicial Advanced Trial Skills/Complex Litigation Seminar Course (April 30, 2010). 

How Product-Related Risk Management Can Be a Lifeline for Your Company, Sixth Annual Update of the Law (June 25, 2009).

Managing Class Action Litigation Challenges: Winning Strategies for Tackling Certification, Experts, Damages, International Class Actions and CAFA, American Conference Institute’s Managing Complex Litigation: The 6th National In-House Senior-Level Defense Litigation Forum (February 27, 2009).

Analyzing the Provisions of and Differences Between State Consumer Protection Statutes To Develop an Aggressive Defense Strategy, Drug and Device Forum on Defending Consumer Fraud Claims (September 23, 2008).

Analysis of New Developments and Trends in Class Action Certification, ACI Forum on Positioning the Class Action Defense for Early Success (September 26, 2007).

Certification Claims Come Under Tighter Scrutiny, The National Law Journal, December 4, 2006. 

Lawsuits Without Injury: The Rise of Consumer Protection Claims, Harris Martin Litigation Watch, October 2006. 

Eighth Circuit Joins Growing Number of Circuit Courts in Rejecting the Eisen Rule in the Class Certification Determination, Missouri Association of Defense Counsel Newsletter, Summer 2005. 

Class Action Appeals: Rule 23 (f) and its Jurisprudence, ABA Class Action and Derivative Suits, Summer 2005. 

Court's Use of Daubert-Lite Standard During Class Certification Proceedings is Analytically Less Filling, ABA Class Action and Derivative Suits, Fall 2004. 

Missouri Court Leads the Way in Utilizing Full Daubert Analysis During Class Certification Proceedings, Missouri Organization of Defense Lawyers Newsletter, Fall 2004.

An Overview of Lone Pine Orders in Toxic Tort Litigation, Defense Counsel Journal, October 2004. 

Misplaced Reliance on Eisen and ‘Lower’ Daubert Standard Leads to Certification of Historic Class, For the Defense, September 2004. 

Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Class Certification Standards, Kansas Association of Defense Counsel Newsletter, Summer 2004.