Brittany represents and counsels clients in the Complex Litigation Strategic Counseling Group using her experiences helping clients in diverse industries throughout the litigation lifecycle in providing strategies for a solid foundation for success in court.
Brittany has handled an array of commercial matters, ranging from simple contract disputes to complex business litigation, in state and federal court. She has significant experience defending financial services companies from claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Truth in Lending Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and Telephone Consumer Protection Act, as well as state consumer protection statutes such as Illinois' Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Brittany strives to immediately identify the relevant facts and honestly assess liability enabling her clients to make informed decisions about litigation strategy and settlement without unnecessary expenditures.
Brittany also has considerable knowledge of close corporation disputes and the enforceability of restrictive covenants under Illinois law. She has successfully defended attempts to enforce non-solicitation and non-competition provisions and counseled clients on changes in Illinois law concerning restrictive covenants. Brittany has litigated numerous matters addressing corporate governance and valuation in the close corporation context and recognizes the difficulty of these matters for clients who made significant sacrifices to build their business.
Brittany’s experience includes defending companies facing personal injury and Federal Employers Liability Act claims, and representing clients in bankruptcy proceedings, both to assert claims, and defend adversary proceedings alleging fraudulent transfers, preferential transfers, and violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction.
As someone who is committed to community service and has a love for animals, Brittany is the president of the board of directors of the Evanston Animal Shelter Association and volunteers at the shelter in her spare time.
Representative Matters
John Komperda, Administrator of the Estate of Klara Komperda v. Bridgeview Bank Company, Cook County Circuit Court, No. 2005-L-001346 | Defended claim that bank's predecessor in interest violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act because its apparent agent sold customer annuity contracts that were allegedly unsuitable based on the customer's age and financial circumstances. Following plaintiff's case in chief, the matter was satisfactorily resolved by agreement after defendant presented first trial witness.
Serampore Industries Private (Ltd) Inc v. Cape Fear Industries USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. 4:15-989 | Defended breach of contract and fraud claims based on allegation that materials sold to plaintiff violated an implied warranty causing substantial damage when the materials were used in a municipal construction project. Defendant successfully moved for dismissal of the fraud claim then settled the remaining contract claim at mediation.
Curran v. PNC Bank National Association, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Case No. 17-243 | Defended claim that hundreds of phone calls over four years violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act when customer provided phone number for individual not obligated on the account. Following defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and plaintiffs' depositions, the matter was resolved with the assistance of the judge at a pre-trial conference.
Chicago Meat Authority v. Koziol, Cook County Circuit Court, No. 2014 CH 14372 | Successfully defended plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction and later obtained order granting motion for summary determination of a major issue which declared the post-employment restrictive covenants were unenforceable for lack of adequate consideration.
Klein v. Fifth Third Bank, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:15-02885 | Successfully defended removal of petition filed in Texas state court based on diversity jurisdiction because plaintiff failed to both join and serve the resident defendant prior to removal. The client was able to settle shortly after the district court refused to remand the matter.