Joseph is an attorney in the Environmental and Toxic Tort and Exposure Litigation Practice group, focusing his national environmental practice on litigation in federal and state courts, statutory and regulatory compliance counseling, and enforcement defense. He has negotiated settlements with the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental regulators, and citizen suit plaintiffs, and he also regularly advises clients on administrative review and public comment processes, including Administrative Procedure Act challenges to rulemakings. Joseph is actively assisting clients navigate novel and technically complex issues around emerging contaminants of potential concern, like PFAS, 1,4-dioxane, and microplastics.
Joseph has extensive experience with the cornerstone federal environmental statutes, including the Clean Air Act (stationary and mobile source); Clean Water Act; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA/Superfund); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); Endangered Species Act; Marine Mammal Protection Act; and National Historic Preservation Act.
Joseph's experience also extends to critical state-level environmental laws like the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Green Chemistry Law/Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Safer Consumer Products program, as well as cutting edge areas of concern like PFAS consumer protection statutes and Extended Producer Responsibility waste management regimes.
Joseph regularly represents clients across a spectrum of industries, including manufacturing, traditional and alternative energy generation, refining, mining, pharmaceuticals, chemical manufacture, transportation and logistics, automotive (including electric vehicle manufacturers), consumer products, food and beverage, and brick-and-mortar and e-commerce retailers.
Joseph regularly partners with third-party technical consultants and experts to provide a complete scope of counseling, including engineers, toxicologists, chemists, hydrogeologists, materials scientists, and economists.
Joseph also maintains an active pro bono practice, representing immigrants in removal actions involving asylum/Convention Against Torture claims, partnering with state innocence project organizations to evaluate actual innocence claims for convicted individuals, and advising victim’s rights advocacy groups of state laws and regulations related to mandatory medical reporting and Title IX investigations.
Prior to joining Shook, Joseph was an environmental practice group managing associate in the Washington, DC office of Sidley Austin LLP and he was also previously seconded with Vineyard Wind, which has built the nation’s first commercial-scale offshore wind development project. Joseph graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law where he was an executive editor for the Virginia Environmental Law Journal.
Representative Matters
Representing a pharmaceutical manufacturing company that has been identified as a potentially responsible party at a Superfund site in Puerto Rico, including complex successor liability and asset purchase agreement indemnification claims.
Challenging U.S. EPA’s denial of a Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan and Federal “Good Neighbor Plan” in the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and D.C. Circuit.
Assisting potentially responsible parties navigate new requests for U.S. EPA and state regulators to sample and test for emerging contaminants like PFAS and 1,4-dioxane at Superfund and RCRA sites.
Advising automotive, chemical manufacturing, and food producing companies on emerging Extended Producer Responsibility obligations in Oregon, Colorado, California, Minnesota, and other jurisdictions.
Counseling textile and home goods manufacturing companies over compliance questions regarding California and New York’s emerging PFAS consumer products notification and restrict laws.
Assisting a barge transportation company with air and stormwater permit compliance.
Negotiated settlement of a Clean Water Act citizen suit action in California federal district court on behalf of an industrial metal plating facility.
Assisted a California-based metals and coatings company with annual South Coast Air Quality Management District reporting obligations and related air permit compliance issues.
Represented the first U.S. commercial scale offshore wind development project in multiple concurrent federal district court lawsuits, challenging federal agency environmental review and permitting.
Represented a Fortune 50 company in ongoing settlement negotiations with U.S. Department of Justice to resolve alleged Clean Air Act and FIFRA violations.
Advised more than 10 multinational pesticide registrants, manufacturers, and e-commerce retailers on FIFRA compliance obligations regarding pesticide registration and labeling, including counseling on emergent issues related to surface and air disinfectant claims under EPA’s COVID-19 pandemic guidance.
Presentations
AI: Ethical and Practical Questions for Lawyers and Consultants, Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference, September 15, 2025 (with Tyler Marshall, The Stanley Group).
Post Inauguration Litigation Trends and Forecasting, PFAS Litigation and Regulatory Developments Conference, February 6, 2025.
Ethics Plenary: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, American Bar Association Joint Regional CLE Program, January 22, 2025.
Emerging Trends in PFAS Litigation, Client Presentation, October 2024.
EPA Future Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication: SEC v. Jarkesy, ABA SEER’s Enforcement & Litigation Webinar, June 7, 2024.
PFAS: A Rundown of Regulations and an Analysis of EPA’s PFAS Roadmap, Midwest Environmental Compliance Conference, September 26, 2023 (with Andrea Collier, Barr Engineering).
Publications
Federal Court Puts Oregon Extended Producer Responsibility Program On Limited Hold Ahead Of Upcoming Trial, Shook Environmental Client Alert, February 2026.
California Proposes Listing Dish Detergents and Shampoos Containing 1,4-Dioxane as Priority Products Under Safer Consumer Products Program, Shook “Material Concerns” Newsletter, February 2026.
Alabama Enacts Law to Govern State-Level Environmental Regulation and Set “Best Available Science” Threshold, Shook “Material Concerns” Newsletter, February 2026.
EPA Again Proposes Nationwide Drinking Water Standards for Perchlorate, Shook “Material Concerns” Newsletter, January 2026.
EPA Seeks Public Comment on Updated Formaldehyde Risk Assessment Under TSCA, Shook “Material Concerns” Newsletter, December 2025.
EPA Again Extends Deadline To Propose Enforceable National Drinking Water Standards for Perchlorate, Shook “Material Concerns” Newsletter, November 2025.
Lurking in the Corner: The Other Big 2024 Admin Law Decision, American Bar Association Natural Resources & Environment, Vol. 40, No. 2, Fall 2025 (with Tom Grever).
Tennessee Passes First-of-its-Kind Law to Require “Sound Science” in Environmental Regulations, 34-5 Mealey’s Emerging Toxic Torts 16, June 3, 2025.
Multimedia
Redefining Administrative Enforcement Power / Environmental Implications, “In That Case” Shook Podcast, February 5, 2025.