A skilled litigator with more than 25 years of experience, Gary has been described as an “outstanding attorney” who has “an ability to drown out the everyday noise of law practice and deliver exceptional and focused work product for all of his clients.” He has handled a broad range of commercial cases for clients such as Rivian, Envestnet and the Chicago Cubs, including hundreds of matters involving trademarks, copyright, trade secrets, patents and restrictive covenants. Gary also represents Fortune 500 companies, private equity firms and trading companies in cases concerning post-acquisition disputes, alleged securities violations, breaches of contract, breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud, privacy violations and consumer class actions. He has first-chaired trials, arbitrations and other evidentiary hearings across the country with great success.

Gary regularly represents clients in pro bono matters, including recently helping two children obtain political asylum in the United States to save them from gang violence in El Salvador. 


Matters Of Note

Commercial Litigation and Post-Closing Disputes

Gary represented an investment fund in a suit against an Indian tribe and related parties arising out of a $50 million gaming bond transaction. In a highly publicized Seventh Circuit decision, his clients prevailed on jurisdiction and sovereign immunity issues, which enabled the case to proceed in state court rather than tribal court. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 807 F.3d 184 (7th Cir. 2015). After winning a key liability issue at the first phase of the trial, the case settled favorably.

Gary represented former officers and directors of the Tribune Company in several consolidated actions arising out of the Tribune’s 2007 leveraged buyout.

He was lead counsel representing a major pharmaceutical company in a dispute concerning alleged violations of an API supply agreement. Working with our client, Gary advanced contractual arguments to significantly limit the company’s exposure.

Gary defended a pharmaceutical company in another dispute concerning performance under a joint development agreement. He helped develop a damages theory which lead to a favorable resolution in mediation.

He was lead counsel for a high net worth wealth management firm in a five-day AAA arbitration against departed shareholders concerning post-withdrawal contractual obligations.

Gary defended the developer of a wind energy project in a suit by a potential buyer who claimed rights to the project under a letter of intent and a purported oral partnership agreement. After persuading the court to set a jury trial for six weeks after the complaint was filed, the case settled on favorable terms.

Gary also defended a proprietary trading firm and its owners in several lawsuits involving claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud arising out of the sale of certain business operations. In one such case, he prevailed on summary judgment, which was upheld on appeal. Benson v. TD Options, LLC, 941 N.E.2d 386 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).

Gary defended a trading firm in litigation and related arbitration against a former member who claimed rights in the firm’s trading platform. His client prevailed in the litigation on a motion for judgment on the pleadings and received a complete defense win in arbitration, including an award of attorneys’ fees.

Gary successfully defended IBM in several large breach-of-contract and fraud cases concerning complex software implementations. Irwin Seating Co. v. IBM, 306 Fed. Appx. 239 (6th Cir. 2009); M. Block & Sons, Inc. v. IBM, 2004 WL 1557631 (N.D. Ill. 2004). He also represented IBM in other matters, including a suit brought by FTD.com related to the design of a website and a suit brought by a subcontractor concerning work on a government computer project that ended in summary judgment in favor of IBM. Business Systems Engineering, Inc. v. IBM, 547 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2008).

Intellectual Property Litigation

Gary led the damages team in a patent infringement trial against Google which resulted in a $339 million verdict. Touchstream Technologies Inc. v Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Gary is defending a large financial technology firm against claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, in which the plaintiff is seeking over $100 million.

Gary represented the Chicago Cubs in a suit against the owners of buildings across from Wrigley Field who charged admission to watch Cubs games from the rooftops of their facilities. The case involved novel issues of common law misappropriation, copyright preemption and the fair use doctrine. After defeating two dispositive motions, the case settled favorably.

For the Chicago Cubs as well as a variety of other clients, including Groupon, Snap-on and Republic Tobacco, Gary has handled dozens of trademark and copyright cases.

Gary was counsel for a communications platform service which has three patent suits pending in California concerning two-factor authentication and call router technology.

Gary also represented a technology firm in a dispute regarding the ownership of rights in a patent for security software. The case resolved favorably after prevailing on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

In another case, Gary represented Envestnet in a dispute concerning the ownership of intellectual property rights in a jointly developed software application. Gary defeated a motion for preliminary injunction and prevailed on a motion to dismiss. Fetter Logic, Inc. v. Envestnet Asset Management, Inc., 2010 WL 55495 (D. Colo. 2010).

Gary also represented a proprietary trading firm in a case concerning the ownership of copyrights and other intellectual property rights in a computer system used to trade options. He first-chaired a two-week trial, which led to a favorable settlement.

Privacy and Data Security

Gary is representing several companies in privacy class actions brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).

A financial company retained Gary to investigate and prosecute claims related to a cyberattack on its information systems. Days after retention, we filed suit and obtained a temporary restraining order and order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to seize the defendant's computer equipment. The seized equipment led to a second defendant and a second TRO.

Gary defended the first-ever internet privacy class actions.

Gary also regularly counsels clients on cybersecurity matters and related indemnity and insurance issues.

Class Actions

In addition to the privacy class actions discussed above, Gary represented an automobile manufacturer in a putative class action asserting claims related to allegedly defective paint.

He represented insurance company plaintiffs in a massive class action concerning the workers' compensation reinsurance pool. The case settled for more than $400 million.

Gary defended Sirius in a putative class action arbitration concerning a lifetime subscription program. The case settled favorably before a decision on class certification.

He defended a streaming media company in internet privacy class actions and prevailed on a motion to compel individual, non-class arbitration pursuant to a clickwrap agreement.

Gary also represented a technology company in class actions involving allegations of consumer fraud and successfully enforced a forum clause in a license agreement.

Unfair Competition Cases

Gary has represented clients in more than 100 unfair competition cases in federal and state courts and arbitration forums nationwide. Most of these cases involved claims for breach of post-termination covenants, misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty. His clients in this area have included broker dealers, insurance companies, professional services firms and distributors.

Presentations and Publications 

AI Applications in the Practice of Law, Chicago Ethics CLE Conference, May 2, 2024 (with James Devaney).

AI Applications in the Practice of Law, Ave Maria School of Law, Business Law Institute, January 19, 2024 (with James Devaney).

Tips for Building an AI Framework, Podcast, August 2, 2023 (with Camila Tobón).

Sharing Risk & Reward: Best Practices in Client-Law Firm Partnerships, LF Dealmakers Forum - Advancing Litigation Finances, New York City, September 17, 2018. 

Beyond the Basics of Litigation Funding: A 360 Degree Perspective, Legaltech Conference, February 1, 2018.

Biometric Privacy: The Next Frontier of Privacy Liability, Webinar (with Al Saikali, Anna Knight & Patrick Castle).

Panelist, Cross-Border Clashes and Cooperation Among Courts, 15th Annual North American Offshore Alert Conference, Miami, Florida, April 30-May 2, 2017.

Social Media and Attorney Ethical Obligations, June 2015.

The Overlooked Power of Copyright Law, Intellectual Property Law360, July 18, 2013 (with Dan Hinkle).

8 Steps to Enforceable Terms of Use on Mobile Devices, Media & Entertainment Privacy and Technology Law360, April 4, 2013 (with Dan Hinkle).

Best Practices for Brief Writing, Practicing Law Institute, Federal Civil Practice Update 2012 (with Michael Dickler).

Trials — Preparing and Examining Witnesses, June 12, 2012 (with Claudia Rustad).

Trial Preparation: The Final Pretrial Order, May 3, 2012 (with Claudia Rustad).

Privilege Issues Confronting In-House Counsel, May 7, 2012 (with Lynn Murray).

Trade Dress and Other Intellectual Property - Implications for Landlords, December 3, 2007 (with Lynn Murray).

Protecting Your Products and Packaging, October 18, 2007 (with Lynn Murray).

Emergency Litigation, August 31, 2006.

Enforcing Clickwrap Agreements, National Law Journal March 11, 2002 (with Todd Jacobs).

Note, Balancing the Welfare of Children with the Rights of Parents: Petersen v. Rogers and the Role of Religion in Custody Disputes, 73 N.C.L. Rev. 1271 (1995).